Studies on the effect of ultrasound on properties and bonding strength of dentin smear layer / 口腔医学

Objective@# To explore the effect of ultrasound on dentin smear layer's surface and bonding strength of the universal resin adhesive under self-etching mode. @*Methods@# Forty mandibular third molars without caries were randomly divided into two groups; one was polished with silicon carbide sandpaper; the other was polished with silicon carbide sandpaper followed by ultrasonic treatment. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe surface of the dentin. Treated teeth were bonded with two universal resin adhesives, Clearfil Universal Bond (pH=2.3) and All-Bond Universal (pH=3.1), and the penetration of the bonding interface was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) after Rhodamine B staining. Finally, the micro tensile bond strength test was conducted to test the adhesion. @*Results@# The SEM showed that after polishing with silicon carbide sandpaper, the smear layer of the dentin surface was scratched, and dentin tubules were almost completely blocked, with no obvious dentin tubules exposed. After ultrasonic treatment, the scratches were reduced, and a large number of dentin tubules were exposed. CLSM showed that both adhesives could penetrate the dentin along the dentin tubules more deeply after ultrasound treatment. Micro tensile bond strength tests showed that ultrasonic treatment could enhance the bonding strength of two universal resin adhesives. However, there was no statistical difference in bonding strength between these two universal resin adhesives under the same treatment. .@*Conclusion@# Ultrasound can partially remove the smear layer on dentin's surface, expose dentin tubules, and increase universal resin adhesives' penetration depth and bonding strength under self-etching mode

The effect of sonic activated device used for different time on intracanal smear layer removal: An SEM analysis / 口腔医学

Objective @#To observe the clearance of smear layer on the root canal wall in different action time by scanning electron microscope (SEM), and to determine the optimal amount of time using sonically activated irrigation to wash root canal in clinic. @*Methods@# Fifty-six ex vivo human anterior teeth with single straight root canal were selected. After routine mechanical preparation, they were divided into two experimental groups according to different irrigating agents: saline group and EDTA group. Each group was assisted by VDW sonic activation EDDY. The saline group was divided into three subgroups according to the irrigating time: 5 s, 30 s and 50 s; EDTA group was divided into six subgroups according to the irrigating time: 5 s, 10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 40 s and 50 s. The control group did not undergo root canal irrigation. After irrigation, the root was cut longitudinally. The smear layer of crown, middle and apical of root canal wall was observed by SEM.@* Results@# After irrigating for 30 seconds, there was a significant difference between the normal saline group and the control group and the 5 second group (P<0.05), and there was no difference in the middle and apical part (P>0.05). After 50 seconds, there was a significant difference in the score of the smear layer between the apical area and the other groups (P<0.05). After irrigating for 5 seconds or 10 seconds in EDTA group, there was a significant difference between the scores of the crown and middle area of the root canal and the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the apical area (P>0.05). There was a significant difference between the 20-40 second group and the first two groups (P<0.05). There was a significant difference between the 50 second group and the other groups (P<0.05). Comparing the cleaning effect on the smear layer after 50 seconds of irrigating between the two experimental groups, the whole root canal showed significant statistical difference (P<0.05). @*Conclusion @#The EDTA-assisted sonic activated device used for 50 seconds has the best cleaning effect.

Effect of Glycolic Acid, Maleic Acid, and EDTA in the Removal of Smear Layer from Root Canal Dentin

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the efficacy of 5% Glycolic Acid (GA), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA), in removing the smear layer (SL). Material and Methods: For the experiment, forty single-rooted human teeth were selected. To perform the chemo‑mechanical preparation, the root canals were instrumented to an apical size of #30, along with simultaneous irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The samples were allotted to the experimental groups based on the final irrigating solution (n=10): (1) The GA group: 05%, (2) the EDTA group: 17%, (3) the MA group: 7%, and (4) the control group: Distilled water. The teeth were evaluated for the presence or absence of SL using SEM. Results: Comparing the 5% GA, 7% MA and 17% EDTA groups, no statistically significant differences were found at the coronal and middle thirds (p>0.05). However, in the apical third, MA had greater efficacy than EDTA (p=0.002) and GA (p=0.041), with a significant difference in the SL removal, while there was no significant difference between the latter (p=0.148). Conclusion: Thus, it was concluded that 7% maleic acid as a final irrigating solution is more efficacious than 17% EDTA and 5% glycolic acid in eliminating the smear layer from the apical portion of the root canal.

In vitro assessment of interaction between lidocaine hydrochloride and irrigating solutions on root canal dentin: a scanning electron microscope study / Evaluación in vitro de la interacción entre el clorhidrato de lidocaína y las soluciones de irrigación en la dentina del conducto radicular: un estudio con microscopio electrónico de barrid

Aim: To investigate the precipitate formed from the interaction between 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (LA) with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles on root canal dentin, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Material and Methods: Sixty mandibular premolars were decoronated, and the root length standardised. The specimens were randomly distributed into the following groups: Group 1 (control): 2% LA mixed with sterile water without root canal instrumentation, Group 2: 2% LA with 2.5% NaOCl in water without root canal instrumentation, and Group 3: 2% LA with 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles in water without root canal instrumentation. Teeth specimens were split and subjected to SEM analysis at cervical, middle, and apical root thirds. On observing precipitate formation in Group 2, 10 premolars were decoronated and treated with 2% LA and 2.5% NaOCl and subjected to root canal instrumentation. Results: Group 1 and Group 3 showed patent dentinal tubules and no precipitate formation. Group 2 showed precipitate blocking dentinal tubules in all the three sections, and the precipitate could not be removed completely after cleaning and shaping. Conclusion: NaOCl forms an insoluble precipitate on interaction with local anaesthetic solution that cannot be removed after chemo-mechanical preparation. Chitosan nanoparticles do not form any such precipitate and show patent dentinal tubules. Hence, chitosan can be used as a flushing irrigant.

Objetivo: Investigar el precipitado formado a partir de la interacción entre el clorhidrato de lidocaína al 2% con adrenalina (LA), el hipoclorito de sodio al 2,5% (NaOCl) y nanopartículas de quitosano al 0,2% en la dentina del conducto radicular, mediante microscopía electrónica de barrido (SEM). Material y Métodos: Se decoraron 60 premolares mandibulares y se estandarizó la longitud de la raíz. Los especímenes se distribuyeron aleatoriamente en los siguientes grupos: Grupo 1 (control): 2% la que fue mezclado con agua estéril sin instrumentación del conducto radicular, Grupo 2: 2% LA con 2,5% de NaOCl sin instrumentación del conducto radicular y Grupo 3: 2 % LA con 0,2% de nanopartículas de quitosano sin instrumentación del conducto radicular. Las muestras de dientes se dividieron y se sometieron a análisis SEM en los tercios radiculares cervical, medio y apical. Al observar la formación de precipitado en el Grupo 2, 10 premolares fueron decorados y tratados con LA al 2% y NaOCl al 2,5% y sometidos a instrumentación de conductos radiculares. Resultado: El Grupo 1 y el Grupo 3 mostraron túbulos dentinarios permeables y sin formación de precipitados. El grupo 2 mostró precipitado que bloqueaba los túbulos dentinarios en las tres secciones, y el precipitado no se pudo eliminar por completo después de limpieza y conformación. Conclusión: el NaOCl forma un precipitado insoluble al interactuar con la solución anestésica local que no se puede eliminar después de la preparación quimiomecánica. Las nanopartículas de quitosano no forman ningún precipitado de este tipo y muestran túbulos dentinarios permeables. Por lo tanto, el quitosano se puede utilizar como irrigante para el lavado.

Effect of three different conditioning agents on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer restorations – An in vitro study

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the conditioning effects of phosphoric acid/5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) mixture, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate, and 10% polyacrylic acid on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer (GI) restorations. Materials and Methods: Out of 68 extracted premolars, 34 teeth were selected for microleakage and 34 for bond strength evaluation. The samples were divided into the following four groups. Group 1: pretreatment with 50/50 volume% mixture of 5.25% NaOCl solution and 37% phosphoric acid (H3PO4), Group 2:pretreatment with 2% CHX digluconate, Group 3: pretreatment with 10% polyacrylic acid (positive control), and Group 4: no pretreatment (negative control). All the samples were then restored with glass ionomer cement (GIC). Microleakage was evaluated using a stereomicroscope and rhodamine-B dye penetration test. For bond strength, flat dentin surface was exposed and pretreated as mentioned previously and restored with GIC and was evaluated using universal testing machine. Results: Among all the four groups, Group 1 showed least microleakage and highest bond strength when compared with other groups. Whereas the Group 4 samples which were not pretreated with any of the conditioning agent showed the least shear bond strength with greatest cavosurface microleakage when compared to the groups which were pretreated with the conditioning agents. Conclusions: A combination of 50/50 volume % mixture of 37% H3PO4 and 5.25% NaOCl can be a good choice for surface pretreatment of GI restorations.

Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Leakage of Different Bioceramic Retrofilling Materials with and without Smear Layer: A Stereomicroscopic Study

Objective: Present in?vitro study aimed to evaluate the apical leakage of different bioceramic retrofilling materials with and without smear layer. Materials and Methods: Sixty human single?rooted teeth were decoronated at a standardized root length of 13 mm, chemo?mechanically prepared and obturated. After obturation, root?end resection was done and root?end cavities were prepared using ultrasonic tips. The specimens with prepared retro cavities were randomly assigned into 2 groups (n = 30) based on the smear layer removal protocol used. Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 10) based on the bioceramic retrofilling material MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate; Proroot Dentsply/Tulsa), CEM (Calcium?Enriched Mixture; Bionique Dent, Tehran) and ERRM (EndoSequence® Root Repair Material; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). The extension of dye (2% Rhodamine B) penetration was measured in millimetre using a stereomicroscope at 10× zoom. Results were statistically analysed using one?way ANOVA (analysis of variance) test and unpaired Student’s t test. Results: In the presence of smear layer, MTA demonstrated maximum mean apical leakage value (1.70 ± 0.30), followed by CEM (1.40 ± 0.37) and ERRM (1.40 ± 0.23), which was statistically not significant. Without the smear layer, ERRM demonstrated the least mean apical leakage value, which was statistically significant as compared with CEM (P <.05) and MTA ( P <.01). Conclusion(s): All bioceramic retrofilling materials demonstrated apical leakage irrespective of the presence or absence of the smear layer. The presence of a smear layer is beneficial for the sealing ab

Different formulations of peracetic acid: effects on smear layer removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity

Abstract Objective: To assess the effects of different peracetic acid (PAA) formulations on smear layer (SL) removal, dentine erosion, cytotoxicity, and antibiofilm activity. Methodology: SL removal and dentine erosion were assessed using 90 premolars, distributed into six groups, according to final irrigation: PAA formulations (1% Sigma, 1% Bacterend OX, 1% Arposept, and 0.09-0.15% Anioxyde), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and water (control). Cytotoxicity was assessed by methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) and neutral red assays. Antibacterial and antibiofilm effectiveness was evaluated against Enterococcus faecalis. For cytotoxicity and antibiofilm activity assessment, the 2.5% NaOCl was also included. Results: EDTA, Sigma, and Bacterend OX removed more SL than Arposept, Anioxyde, and water (p<0.05). EDTA caused more severe dentine erosion than Sigma and Bacterend OX (p<0.05). Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity than the other solutions (p<0.05). NaOCl, Bacterend OX, Sigma, and Anioxyde significantly reduced E. faecalis colony-forming units (CFU) (p<0.05). The 2.5% NaOCl solution promoted greater biofilm biomass reduction (p<0.05) than the other solutions. All PAA formulations promoted greater biomass reduction than 17% EDTA (p<0.05). Conclusions: Although Sigma and Bacterend OX had higher cytotoxicity, they had a SL removal capability similar to that of EDTA, were as effective as NaOCl against E. faecalis biofilm, and promoted less dentine erosion than EDTA. Arposept and Anioxyde failed to remove the SL, had lower cytotoxicity, and showed less bacterial activity than NaOCl.

Ex vivo evaluation of the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher on the removal of smear layer from the root canal / Avaliação ex vivo da eficácia do XP-endo Finisher na remoção de smear layer do canal radicular

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher (XP) on removal of the smear layer in root canals by comparing different irrigation protocols. Methods: Seventy-two human single-rooted teeth were similarly instrumented using R25 Reciproc files (VDW, Munich, Germany) applied in reciprocating mode with a VDW GOLD endo motor (VDW, Munich, Germany). The working length was determined at 1 mm short of the apical foramen. The canals were irrigated with 5 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite during instrumentation. The teeth were divided at random into six groups (n=12). A control group, which was not submitted to the final irrigation protocol, and five experimental groups with different irrigants and agitation techniques: EDTA/File, EDTA/XP, EDTA/Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), Distilled Water (DW)/XP, and DW/PUI). Smear layer removal quality scores were assessed in the apical, middle, and cervical thirds of the root canal based on images obtained by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by two-by-two comparisons with the Dunn test (α=5%). Results: EDTA/File, EDTA/PUI, and EDTA/XP groups demonstrated significantly lower scores than the other groups (P<0.05) in all thirds evaluated. No significant difference was observed between the groups in which distilled water was used and the control group in all thirds evaluated (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The XP-endo Finisher file did not increase the efficiency of EDTA in removal of the smear layer in root canals.

RESUMO Objective: Avaliar a eficácia do XP-endo Finisher (XP) na remoção da smear layer em canais radiculares, comparando diferentes protocolos de irrigação. Métodos: Setenta e dois dentes humanos unirradiculares foram similarmente instrumentados usando limas R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany) aplicadas no modo reciprocrantes em um motor endodôntico VDW GOLD (VDW, Munich, Germany). O comprimento de trabalho foi determinado a 1 mm aquém do forame apical. Os canais foram irrigados com 5 mL de hipoclorito de sódio 2,5% durante a instrumentação. Os dentes foram divididos aleatoriamente em seis grupos (n=12). Um grupo controle, que não foi submetido ao protocolo final de irrigação, e cinco grupos experimentais com diferentes irrigantes e técnicas de agitação: EDTA/Lima, EDTA/XP, EDTA/Irrigação Ultrassônica Passiva (IUP), Água destilada (AD)/XP, e AD/IUP). Os escores de qualidade de remoção da camada de smear layer foram avaliados nos terços apical, médio e cervical do canal radicular com base em imagens obtidas por microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Os dados foram analisados pelo teste de Kruskal-Wallis, seguido de comparações dois a dois pelo teste de Dunn (α = 5%). Resultados: Os grupos EDTA/lima, EDTA/PUI e EDTA/XP demonstraram escores significativamente menores que os outros grupos (P <0,05). Não foi observada diferença entre os grupos que utilizaram água destilada e o grupo controle em todos os terços avaliados (P> 0.05). Conclusão: A lima XP-endo Finisher não aumentou a eficiência do EDTA na remoção da smear layer em canais radiculares.

Evaluation of The Cleaning Protocol of Post Space on Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the effect of four irrigation solutions for post space cleaning on the bond strength between glass fiber post and root dentine. Forty bovine roots were root-filled and randomly divided into four groups (n=10), according to the irrigation solution: CG (Control Group): saline solution; SH (Sodium Hypochlorite Group); CLX (Chlorhexidine group) and EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid group). Specimens were submitted to mechanical aging and push-out test. Statistical analysis (ANOVA two-way and Tukey test; p<0.05) was performed. A stereomicroscope was used for failure mode classification. EDTA showed higher bond strength values, differing statistically from SH and CG (p<0.05). Adhesive failure between dentin and resinous cement was predominant, followed by mixed failures. SEM images showed pronounced smear layer removal in the EDTA group. 17 % EDTA was better than other solutions for cleaning of post space when using glass fiber posts.

RESUMEN: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar el efecto de cuatro soluciones de irrigación para la limpieza del espacio del poste sobre la fuerza de unión entre el poste de fibra de vidrio y la dentina radicular. Se rellenaron cuarenta raíces bovinas y se dividieron aleatoriamente en cuatro grupos (n = 10), según la solu- ción de riego: CG (Grupo Control): solución salina; SH (Gru- po de hipoclorito de sodio); CLX (grupo clorhexidina) y EDTA (grupo ácido etilendiaminotetraacético). Las muestras se sometieron a una prueba de envejecimiento mecánico y de expulsión. Se realizó análisis estadístico (ANOVA bidireccional y prueba de Tukey; p <0,05). Se utilizó un microscopio estereoscópico para la clasificación del modo de falla. EDTA mostró valores de fuerza de unión más altos, difiriendo estadísticamente de SH y CG (p <0,05). Pre-dominó la falla adhesiva entre dentina y cemento resinoso, seguida de fallas mixtas. Las imágenes SEM mostraron una eliminación pronunciada de la capa de frotis en el grupo de EDTA. El EDTA al 17 % fue mejor que otras soluciones para la limpieza del espacio de los postes cuando se utilizan postes de fibra de vidrio.

Efficacy of different instruments for the mechanical removal of the smear layer in immediate post preparations / Eficacia de diferentes instrumentos para la remoción mecánica del barro dentinario en preparaciones inmediatas para poste

ABSTRACT Adhesively cemented fiber-reinforced composite posts are commonly used to reconstruct endodontically treated teeth. Adhesion to intraradicular dentin is complex, and close contact between the resin cements and the dentin is essential. The removal of the smear layer following post space preparation (secondary smear layer) can improve this integration. Different mechanical systems have been used to activate the irrigant inside the root canal. The purpose of this study was to compare, ex-vivo, the removal of the smear layer from the walls of the immediate post space preparation by the action of three mechanized instruments. Forty premolar specimens with a single root canal were selected, endodontically treated, and shaped for glass fiber post cementation with Peeso reamer #1 (Dentsply Sirona, Switzerland) and Macrolock finishing drill #3 (RTD, France). The specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10): Group C (control); Group PUI (passive ultrasonic irrigation); Group CEP (Rotoprox brush, Hager Werken, Germany) and Group XP (XP-endo Finisher, FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). Post space surfaces were cleaned with 3mL of distilled water; each specimen root split longitudinally to expose the root canals, and prepared for examination in a scanning electron microscope at magnification 350X. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests (p>0.05). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p <0.05) were found between Groups C and XP in all three root regions, but not between Groups C, CEP and PIU. Of these, Group CEP showed a better trend in the results of the coronary and middle thirds, without significant difference with Group XP. Although it was difficult to achieve a clean dentin surface after preparation for the fiberglass post, the XP-endo Finisher was the most efficient in removing secondary smear layer, followed by the Rotoprox conical brush.

RESUMEN La fijación adhesiva de postes de fibra es un procedimiento habitual en la rehabilitación de piezas tratadas endodónticamente. La adhesión a dentina radicular resulta compleja, y es fundamental el íntimo contacto entre el medio resinoso y el sustrato dentinario. La eliminación del barro dentinario posterior a la preparación del anclaje intrarradicular podría mejorar esta integración. Para lograr una adecuada limpieza, se han implementado diferentes sistemas mecánicos para la activación del irrigante en el interior del conducto radicular. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue comparar ex-vivo la remoción del barro dentinario de las paredes de la preparación inmediata para poste por acción de tres instrumentos mecanizados. Se utilizaron 40 premolares inferiores unirradiculares tratados endodónticamente y preparados para anclaje intrarradicular con fresa Largo #1 (Dentsply Sirona, Suiza) y fresa piloto del sistema Macrolock Azul (RTD, Francia). Las piezas fueron divididas aleatoriamente en grupos (n=10): GC (control); G PIU (irrigación pasiva ultrasónica); G CEP (cepillo Rotoprox cónico, Hager Werken, Alemania) y G XP (XP-endo Finisher, FKG Dentaire, Suiza). Las preparaciones fueron irrigadas con 3ml de agua destilada; las piezas fueron seccionadas longitudinalmente en sentido proximal, metalizadas y observadas al microscopio electrónico de barrido a 350X. Las imágenes fueron analizadas bajo categorización ordinal y mediante las pruebas de Kruskall - Wallis y Friedman, estableciendo un p<0,05. Existió diferencia significativa (p<0,05) entre el grupo G C y G XP en todos los tercios radiculares, pero no entre G C, G CEP y G PIU. Entre estos grupos, el G CEP marcó una tendencia a mejores resultados en tercio coronario y medio sin diferencia significativa con el G XP. A pesar de la dificultad para lograr una superficie dentinaria limpia luego de preparaciones para poste, el XP- endo Finisher fue el más eficiente en la remoción del barro dentinario secundario, seguido por el cepillo cónico Rotoprox.

Canal Cleanliness and Smear Layer Removal Using Different Irrigant Activation Methods - A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

rrigation is one the most important aspects during root canal treatment of the teeth which can be achieved by mechanical cleaning and shaping with the aid of irrigants. However, the irrigant does not travel to all the places of the root canal especially the apical third. Hence, to make this irrigant reach the apical third, we need irrigant activation methods which will agitate the irrigant and help in accessing the places which are difficult to reach in the root canal system. The objective of this research was to check the canal cleanliness and the removal of the debris after irrigant activation using manual dynamic agitation (MDA), plastic F file, sonic irrigation (SI) and conventional syringe irrigation (CSI). METHODSSixty single rooted teeth were chosen for this study which were biomechanically prepared using ProTaper system (Dentsply Maillefer, USA) up to a preparation of F2 and 3 % NaOCl and 17 % EDTA were used as irrigants. All the samples were equally divided into groups of fifteen each depending on the mode of irrigant activation method used - Group 1, Manual Dynamic Agitation (MDA); Group 2, plastic F file; Group 3, EndoActivator (SI); and Group 4, control group (C). These teeth were then split along the long axis and were observed under the SEM for any debris and to determine the degree of canal cleanliness. RESULTSGroup 4 (control group) showed the maximum debris under SEM with a statistically significant difference with a P value less than 0.05; next was the manual dynamic agitation group. Plastic F file group and sonic irrigation groups showed almost similar results in terms of debris. CONCLUSIONSIrrigant activated using sonic mode and plastic F file efficiently removed the debris in comparison to the other two groups of syringe irrigation and manual dynamic agitation.

Post preparation: cleanness achieved by different irrigating protocols / Preparación para poste: limpieza lograda por diferentes protocolos de irrigación

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of different irrigation protocols to remove from the walls of the root canal and entrance to dentinal tubules the smear layer produced during preparation for a fiber post. Fifty decoronated human lower premolars were treated endodontically and the apical third of the canal was filled with a single gutta-percha point using warm vertical compaction. Ten millimeters were left free for post preparation, which was done by sequential use of a Largo #1 drill and Exacto #3 pilot drill (Angelus, Brazil), with irrigation with distilled water upon each instrument change. Samples were distributed randomly into 5 groups (n=10). G 1: No irrigation after post preparation. G 2: Distilled water activated for 60 s + distilled water. G 3: 5.25% NaOCl 15 s+ distilled water. G 4: 17% EDTA (Farmadental, Argentina) 60 s + 5.25% NaOCl 15 s + distilled water. G 5: 10% polyacrylic acid (Densell) 15 s + distilled water. Irrigant was activated mechanically with a low-speed conical brush. Roots were then split longitudinally in vestibular-lingual direction. Each surface was observed under SEM in its different thirds. Microphotographs were taken at 150X and 600X magnification and results analyzed statistically using Kruskall Wallis and Friedman tests (p<0.05). The results [mean (standard deviation)] were: for 150X: G1 11.00 (1.33), G2 7.50 (3.13), G3 6.30 (2.58), G4 2.20 (2.80), G5 4.30 (1.50), and for 600X G1 11.40 (0.84), G2 10.00 (1.94), G3 7.70 (3.33), G4 5.80 (3.70), G5 7.20 (2.65). The statistical analysis showed significant differences between irrigants (p<0.05) but not between root thirds (p>>0.05). The EDTA+NaOCl combination and polyacrylic acid showed greater capacity to remove the smear layer created during post preparation.

RESUMEN El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la capacidad de diferentes protocolos de irrigación para remover el barro dentinario de las paredes del conducto y entrada de los túbulos dentinarios, producido durante la preparación para anclaje intarradicular. Se utilizaron 50 premolares inferiores humanos a los cuales se les cortó la corona clínica. Luego se les realizó tratamiento endodóntico y obturación del tercio apical con cono único de conicidad aumentada y compactación vertical caliente. Se dejaron libres 10 mm para la preparación para poste que se realizó utilizando secuencialmente fresa de Largo # 1y fresa piloto Exacto #1(Angelus, Brasil), irrigando a cada cambio de instrumento con agua destilada. Las muestras fueron distribuidas aleatoriamente en 5 grupos (n=10). G 1: No se efectuó ningún lavaje. Los irrigantes fueron activados con cepillo mecánico cónico a baja velocidad. G 2: Agua destilada activada 60 s+ agua destilada G 3: NaOCl al 5,25%, 15 s+ agua destilada. G 4: EDTA al 17% (Farmadental, Argentina) 60 s +NaOCl al 5,25% 15 s , + agua destilada. G 5 : Ácido poliacrílico al 10% ( Densell) 15 s + agua destilada. Posteriormente, las raíces fueron seccionadas longitudinalmente en sentido vestíbulo lingual. Cada superficie fue observada al MEB en sus diferentes tercios. Las micrografías se realizaron a 150 y 600 X y los resultados analizados estadísticamente mediante test de Kruskall Wallis y Friedman (p<0,05), Los resultados [Medias (desviaciones estándar)] fueron: para 150X G1 11,00(1,33), G2 7,50 (3,13), G3 6,30 (2,58), G4 2,20 (2,80), G5 4,30 (1,50) y para 600X G1 11,40 (0,84), G2 10,00 (1,94), G3 7,70 (3,33), G4 5,80 (3,70), G5 7,20 (2,65). El análisis estadístico mostró diferencia significativa entre irrigantes (p<0,05) pero no entre tercios radiculares (p>0,05). La combinación de EDTA+NaOCl y el ácido poliacrílico tendrían mayor capacidad de remoción del barro dentinario creado durante la preparación para poste.

The Effect of 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and 10% Citric Acid Solutions with Manual and Ultrasonic Agitation on Smear Layer Removal and Intraradicular Dentine Erosion: A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation

This study evaluated the ex vivo effectiveness of different final irrigation protocols in smear layer removal and intraradicular dentine erosion. Thirty five extracted human canines were instrumented and randomly divided, according to final rinse techniques used, into 7 groups: 1 (ED3M) and 3 (ED3US), 17% EDTA for 3 minutes with manual and ultrasonic agitation, respectively; 2 (CA30M) and 4 (CA30US), 10% citric acid for 30 seconds with manual and ultrasonic agitation, respectively; 5 (CA3M) and 6 (CA3US), 10% citric acid for 3 minutes with manual and ultrasonic agitation, respectively; and, 7 (Na3), 5.25% NaOCl for 3 minutes without agitation (control). All specimens then were irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl, split lengthwise, and examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in apical, middle and coronal thirds. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. The effectiveness of 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in removing smear layer was significantly greater than 5.25% NaOCl (control). There were no significant differences among final irrigation protocols in smear layer removal or erosive effects. However, when comparing the thirds in groups 1 (ED3M) and 2 (CA30M), the least smear layer removal and erosion was seen in the apical third, but the group 4 procedure (CA30US) was more effective than 1 (ED3M) (p=0.0004), 2 (CA30M) (p=0.0018) or 3 (ED3US) (p=0.0003) in smear layer removal for the apical third. It was concluded that protocols used in this study were similar in smear layer removal and erosive effects.

Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation on the bonding strength of permanent teeth / 口腔疾病防治

@#The concept of “minimally invasive dentistry” aims to provide conservative treatment of cavities in which sound dentin is removed. Because the Er: YAG laser can selectively remove caries, the smear layer is removed, dentin tubules are exposed after the preparation of substrate conditioning, and its advantages of precision, safety and painlessness are deeply valued. At the same time, the bonding strength between the prepared dentin surface and the filling material is different due to the different parameters of the Er: YAG laser. In this paper, the principle of dentin bonding, the mechanism of Er: YAG laser action, after treatment of dentin with different parameters (power, energy density, pulse duration, and irradiation distance), whether there is thermal damage to pulp tissue, the ultramicro morphology of dentin surface, the bonding properties of different bonding systems and the filling materials between irradiated hard tissues were reviewed. An appropriate parameter range (power ≤ 10 Hz, energy density ≤ 60 mJ, and pulse duration ≤ 50 μs) combined with water spray cooling will not cause thermal damage to the pulp tissue, while the higher power, energy density and pulse duration of laser treatment for dentin will lead to melting, carbonization, cracks, narrowing of the gap between collagen fibers, etc., which will limit the penetration of adhesives and have a negative impact on bonding. However, whether the adhesive systems based on the smear layer are suitable for dentin after laser treatment needs to be further explored.

Effect of different smear layers on the bonding performance and durability of four adhesive systems / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: When the tooth surface is treated with a rotary or manual instrument, a smudge layer is formed on the enamel and dentin by debris generated by cutting and abrasion. The bonding interface between the adhesive and the dentin is considered as a weak part in the direct repair process. To clarify the effect of smear layer on different kinds of adhesive is significantly important for dentists to select and correctly use the adhesive in clinical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different diamond burs on the dentin bonding performance of four adhesive systems to dentin after 24 hours and 100 days of artificial saliva-storage. METHODS: Adhesive systems were: (1) VSA (Optibond Versa, Kerr); (2) AIO (Optibond All in One, Kerr); (3) SBU (Single bond Universal, 3M); (4) GLU (Bond 5, Gluma, Heraeus). In present study, 80 extracted human molars were randomly divided into four groups and each group is divided into 4 subgroups. Dentin surfaces were prepared by: (1) 600-grit SiC-paper (control group); (2) super-fine diamond bur; (3) regular diamond bur; (4) coarse diamond bur. Bonding agent was applied according to each manufacturer’s instruction. After light-curing, dentin surfaces were built-up with resin composite (A2, CHARISMA, Heraeus). The micro-tensile bond strength was determined after 24 hours and 100 days of storage in artificial saliva at 37 °C. The fractured surfaces on dentin side were observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Storage for 24 hours: There was no significant difference among groups under VSA and GLU. Under SBU and AIO, the bond strength in the coarse diamond bur group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0. 05). Using coarse diamond bur, the bond strength in the VSA group had significant difference compared with the AIO, GLU and SBU groups (P 0. 05). (2) Storage for 100 days, there was no significant difference among groups under VSA and GLU. Under SBU, the bond strength in the coarse diamond bur group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0. 05). Using regular diamond bur, the bond strength showed no significant difference in the GLU group compared with the SBU, and VSA groups (P > 0. 05). Using coarse diamond bur, the bond strength had no significant difference between VSA and AIO groups (P < 0. 05). (3) Using VSA, the bond strength in each group at 100 days showed significant difference compared with that at 24 hours (P < 0. 05). (4)Compared with immersed for 24 hours, the ratio of bond interface and combined crack in the VSA, SBU and GLU groups after immersed for 100 days was increased, especially the VSA group. Compared with the other groups, the ratio of bond interface and combined crack in the GLU group after immersed for 24 hours and 100 days both increased by 50%. (5) These results indicate that preparation by different burs produces different smear layers, which has significant effect to self-etching adhesive system and has no significant effect to total-etching adhesive system. Storage time makes effect on different adhesives.

Cleaning efficacy of two kinds of mechanical nickel-titanium instruments in preparation of severely curved root canals: A scanning electron microscopic study / 中国组织工程研究

BACKGROUND: The preparation and cleaning of severely curved root canal is the difficult point of root canal treatment. A large number of smear layer will be produced in the process of root canal preparation. Removing effectively these debris and smear layer will be conducive to improving the success rate and longterm effect of severely curved root canal treatment. OBJECTIVE: To explore the cleaning efficacy of Twisted File and ProTaper file combined with chemical preparation on smear layer of severely curved root canal by scanning electron microscope. METHODS: Twenty clinically extracted mandibular molars with severely curved root canals were collected and randomly divided into two groups: Twisted File group and ProTaper group. The root canals were prepared by Twisted file and ProTaper Ni-Ti file, respectively. They were prepared by chemical method with 3% NaClO and 17% EDTA. After preparation, the root canals were split longitudinally and the cleaning efficacy of smear layer of coronal, middle and apical thirds was observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The images of scanning electron microscope showed that the dentinal tubules of root canal coronal thirds in the ProTaper group and Twisted file group were completely open, almost without smear layer. Dentinal tubules of middle thirds were also open, and simply part of them were covered by smear layer. However, dentinal tubules of apical thirds had few and no obvious opening, and was covered by a large number of smear layer. (2) In Twisted file group, the scores of smear layer at root canal apical thirds were higher than coronal and middle thirds (P 0.05). (3) The results showed that the chemo-mechanical preparation with Twisted File and ProTaper could remove effectively the debris and smear layer in the root canal walls of coronal and middle thirds of the severely curved crown, but the removal effect on apical thirds and dentin tubules was not good.

Efecto del EDTAC y del ácido cítrico sobre la pared dentinaria. Variación del tiempo de exposición y la edad dentaria / Effect of EDTAC and citric acid on dentinal walls. Variation of exposure time and dental age

The aim of this study was to find a formula and application time for chelators effective in cleaning the root canal without causing erosion and considering dental age. The sample included 120 teeth: 60 taken from young patients and 60 from adult patients. They were instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Each subgroup was divided randomly into six groups: 4 groups of 12 teeth and 2 control groups of 6 teeth. In the final irrigation, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid plus Cetavlón (EDTAC) or 10% citric acid was applied for 1 or 3 minutes according to each group. The results showed a high level of cleanliness, and a few showed erosion of the dentinal tubules. Satisfactory results were obtained in the removal of the smear layer when applying EDTAC or citric acid combined with NaOCl. Erosion was present in different degrees regardless of dental age, but it was indeed affected by the irrigant exposure time.

O objetivo deste estudo foi obter uma fórmula e um tempo de aplicação dos quelantes efetivos que permitam a limpeza das paredes do canal sem causar erosões, levando em consideração a idade dental. A amostra foi composta por 120 dentes, 60 de pacientes jovens e 60 de pacientes adultos, foram instrumentados e irrigados com hipoclorito de sódio (NaOCl) a 2,5%. Cada subgrupo foi dividido aleatoriamente em 6 grupos: 4 grupos de 12 dentes e 2 grupos de controle com 6 dentes cada um. Na irrigação final, ácido etilenodiaminotetracético com Cetavlón (EDTAC) 17% ou ácido cítrico 10% foi aplicado por 1 ou 3 minutos, dependendo do grupo. Os resultados mostraram um bom nível de limpeza com algumas amostras com erosão dos túbulos dentinários. Com EDTAC ou ácido cítrico combinado com NaOCl, resultados satisfatórios foram obtidos na remoção da camada de esfregaço . A erosão esteve presente em seus diferentes graus independentemente da idade dentária, mas não do tempo de exposição do irrigante.

Evaluation of debris and smear layer removal with XP-endo finisher: A scanning electron microscopic study

Context: The presence of smear layer and debris can prevent the irrigant and sealer from penetrating the dentinal tubules thereby compromising the seal of the root canal filling. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher with ProTaper Next and HyFlex in smear layer and debris removal. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two extracted mandibular premolar teeth were selected and sectioned at the cementoenamel junction. The roots were then randomly divided into 4 groups. In group 1 and 2, canals were instrumented with X2 ProTaper Next (25 0.06 taper). In group 3 and 4, canals were instrumented with HyFlex system (25 0.06 taper). The canals in group 2 and 4 were further finished with XP-endo Finisher. Irrigation was carried out using 3% sodium hypochlorite during instrumentation, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was used as the final rinse. The roots were then split longitudinally. The canal wall was observed under the scanning electron microscope in coronal, middle, and apical thirds at a magnification of ×400 and ×1000 for evaluation of debris and smear layer, respectively. Photomicrographs were taken, and qualitative assessment for debris and smear layer removal was done. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: Lower debris and smear layer scores were seen in canal thirds instrumented with ProTaper Next and XP-endo Finisher (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The use of XP-endo Finisher as an adjuvant during shaping and cleaning produced cleaner root canal walls.

Efeito de diferentes protocolos de irrigação final na remoção da smear layer / Effect of different protocols of final irrigation on smear layer removal

Objetivo: esse estudo avaliou o efeito de protocolos de irrigação final, associados ao uso de EDTA e QMix, na remoção de smear layer. Métodos: foram utilizados 40 dentes humanos com canal único. Os canais foram instrumentados com sistema ProTaper Universal SX-F3. As substâncias químicas utilizadas durante o preparo foram hipoclorito de sódio a 5,25% (NaOCl) ou clorexidina a 2% (CHX) gel. Terminado o preparo, os dentes foram divididos em oito grupos, de acordo com os irrigantes: G1) NaOCl 5,25% + EDTA 17% + NaOCl 5,25%; G2) NaOCl 5,25% + EDTA 17% + água destilada (AD); G3) NaOCl 5,25% + QMix + NaOCl 5,25%; G4) NaOCl 5,25% + QMix + AD; G5) CHX 2% gel + EDTA 17% + CHX 2% solução; G6) CHX 2% gel + EDTA 17% + AD; G7) CHX 2% gel + QMix + CHX 2% solução e G8) CHX 2% gel + QMix + AD. As amostras foram avaliadas por microscopia eletrônica de varredura ambiental, antes e após os protocolos de irrigação final. As imagens foram classificadas por escores, em relação à presença de smear layer, e os dados foram analisados pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis e de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: o G1 mostrou os melhores resultados em relação à remoção de smear layer (p < 0,05). A CHX gel 2% mostrou menor formação de smear layer, quando comparada ao NaOCl, após o preparo biomecânico; e o NaOCl apresentou melhor limpeza como irrigante final (p < 0,05). Conclusões: o NaOCl como irrigante final, combinado ao EDTA, mostrou melhor capacidade de remoção da smear layer (AU).

Introduction: This study evaluated the effect of different final irrigation protocols using EDTA and QMix on smear layer removal. Methods: The root canals of 40 single-rooted human teeth were prepared with ProTaper Universal SX - F3. The substances used were 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gel (chlorhexidine), 2% chlorhexidine solution and distilled water. The teeth were divided into 8 groups, according to the irrigant used: G1: 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + 5.25% NaOCl; G2: 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA + distilled water; G3: 5.25% NaOCl + QMix + 5.25% NaOCl; G4: 5.25% NaOCl + QMix + DW; G5: 2% chlorhexidine gel + 17% EDTA + 2% chlorhexidine solution; G6: 2% chlorhexidine gel + 17% EDTA + distilled water; G7: 2% chlorhexidine gel + QMix + 2% chlorhexidine solution; and G8: 2% chlorhexidine gel + QMix + distilled water. Samples were evaluated under environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) before and after irrigation. ESEM images were classified according to smear layer scores, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Group 1 had the best results for smear layer removal (p<0.05). Smear layer formation was lower when 2% chlorhexidine gel was used after cleaning and shaping than when the irrigant was 5.25% NaOCl, and 5.25% NaOCl had the best cleaning ability as a final irrigant. Conclusion: 5.25% NaOCl combined with EDTA was the best final irrigant for smear layer removal (AU).

Marginal microleakage of glass ionomer cement with two different cavity conditioners on primary anterior teeth – An in vitro study

Background and Objective: Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are the most commonly used restorative material in pediatric dentistry. They have numerous advantages; however, they show some marginal microleakage at the restoration–tooth interface. Various conditioning agents have been tested for alteration or dissolution of smear layer which has been attributed to the occurrence of microleakage; however, very limited studies have been done using primary teeth. Aims: To evaluate and compare the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid and 17% EDTA on marginal microleakage of high-viscosity GIC. Settings and Design: Experimental, in vitro study. Methodology: Class V cavities of standardized dimensions were prepared on 60 primary anterior teeth and were randomly divided into three groups. Except Group I, the cavities of Groups II and III were conditioned with 10% polyacrylic acid and 17% EDTA, respectively. All the 60 teeth were then restored with high-viscosity GIC. The samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue solution for 24 h. The teeth were removed from the stain, rinsed, and sectioned buccolingually and were observed under stereomicroscope at 30× to score the marginal microleakage. Statistical Analysis Used: Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc analysis were used to compare the mean marginal leakage scores between the three study groups. Results: Statistical significance difference was found between all the three groups (P < 0.05). The mean marginal microleakage score was maximum for Group I (control group; 3.00), whereas it was the least for Group II (1.30) where 10% polyacrylic was used for conditioning the cavity surface. Conclusion: Among the study groups, none of them was completely devoid of microleakage in all its samples. 10% polyacrylic acid emerged as a better conditioning agent when compared with 17% EDTA in altering or removing the smear layer thereby resulting in better adhesion.